Thought leadership: the good, the bad and the lazy. How to make your ideas cut through

Most B2B thought leadership content fails because there's no soul behind the words. Typically, it's just an assembly of search results and pasteurised opinion. Sales spin poses as wisdom. Argument is edited out. The author could be anyone from anywhere. The result is just more dross that will never stop the scroll. And that's a wasted opportunity, because, done properly, thought leadership is one of the most effective marketing tools available.

---

There’s a lot of thought leadership out there, but most of it is useless.

Buyers are swimming in an ocean of insights that don’t actually say anything. Opinions are carefully stripped of controversy. Executive headshots are placed above articles that could have been written by anyone, anywhere, about anything.

It’s a sad situation, because, done properly, thought leadership is one of the most powerful marketing tools available. Before you shake your head and say I'm wrong, consider this: 71% of B2B buyers think thought leadership is more effective than conventional marketing at demonstrating a vendor’s value. 79% are more likely to advocate internally for a vendor whose thought leadership they respect. And 82% say that reading executive-authored content builds their trust in a company.

The issue isn’t that thought leadership doesn’t work, it clearly does. The problem is that most content calling itself thought leadership isn’t that at all.

What bad thought leadership looks like

Bad thought leadership is gutless and actively avoids taking a position. You’ll recognise it immediately: vague words about how “AI is transforming everything” without any specifics, global trends explained to a level of abstraction that they’re useless to anyone making a big decision.

Then there’s stealth advertising - the practice of dressing up product sales in the language of opinion, hoping readers won’t notice that every insight supports the buying of your product. Well, readers do notice – and it destroys credibility faster than having no content at all.

Ideas that have been so heavily edited by legal, comms, and senior management that nothing interesting survives are another dead end. The instinct to remove anything that could possibly cause disagreement is understandable, but the result is content that offends no one and persuades no one. It’s just more junk.

Also, watch out for showing your age: presenting a trend that peaked eighteen months ago as breaking news doesn’t say your finger is on the pulse it says quite the opposite.

Thought leadership that works

The best thought leadership makes the reader feel they’ve learned something they couldn’t find elsewhere. That may sound simple, but it disqualifies an enormous sum of content before it’s even written.

It means taking a genuine position, one that doesn’t sit carefully in the middle of every argument, hedge its bets, or say “it depends” so many times the reader gives up. Taking a stance means being willing to be wrong, and that’s exactly what makes it worth reading.

Good thought leadership content is also specific. “Many companies struggle with digital transformation” is not an insight, it’s a filler sentence. The best stuff names the problem precisely, identifies who it affects, and explains what to do differently using real data, real industries, and real scenarios.

Good thought leadership also carries the author’s fingerprints, referencing specific conversations, real decisions, and lessons learned from things that went wrong. Readers can feel the difference between an article written from experience and one that’s been assembled from search results.

Most critically, worthwhile thought leadership serves the reader, not the brand. The moment it starts feeling like a product pitch, the reader’s interest is gone.

Does your thought leadership stack up?

Before your next piece of thought leadership goes live, do something most organisations never do: audit one existing example against the criteria above. Read it as a senior buyer would. Someone who has already consumed a dozen pieces of content this week and found most of them forgettable.

Ask whether your piece takes a real position. Whether it’s specific enough to be wrong. Whether it carries any evidence that the author has actually spent time with this problem rather than simply read about it. Whether it would hold up if someone started asking difficult questions in public. If you answers come back negative or unsure, go back and change the content.

Final word

Thought leadership isn’t a secondary marketing channel. For many B2B organisations it’s the primary mechanism through which buyers form a view of your credibility, your expertise, and ultimately whether your company is worth their time and money.

If you can't be bothered to make what you say worthwhile and you're happy with the bad and the lazy, then fair enough, but consider what that says about you and your business. More importantly, remember that negative perceptions stick like superglue.

Learn more

For full-depth insights on thought leadership content – what works, what fails, and how to implement a successful thought leadership campaign, read or download our No-Nonsense Guide to Thought Leadership. No email required. Just click the image and off you go.

---

Follow Chris Godfrey for regular insights and opinion on the business of content & marketing. Subscribe to CONTENTED now

---

Get started with Freelance Words

Strong communication is the bedrock of good business and when there’s a lack of it, problems can arise. Take the ambiguity and doubt out of what your business needs to say. Contact us now.

Contact